requestId:68499ac04b2203.67830511.
The “Three Dynasties of King System” and the End of Chinese Thought
Author: Chen Yun
Source: Author Authorization Confucian Network Release
Original “Chunshan Academy” Issue 2, 2018
Time: Western History May 28, 2018
Abstract: From the meaning laid down by Chinese Thought, Confucius, his group and the Six Sects are the most important things. Through the Sixth Secretariat, Confucius and his group formed the ancient political and religious heritage, and divided the historical views of politics and religion in a typified area, namely emperor and king, and on the other hand, they opened up a new format for the governance of religion from the second. The meaning of the three dynasties of royal system for China’s thinking must be understood through Confucius’s way. Confucius Group proposed the three dynasties from the method of the three dynasties, and laid the foundation for the traditional Chinese political system from Qin to Qing Dynasty. From the perspective of historical studies, Wang Guowei’s “The Discussion on the Yin and Zhou Dynasties” was explained from the perspective of history, and to the point where Confucius and his group could re-examine the beginning of China’s thinking.
Keywords: Three Dynasties of Kings Confucius and his group “The Discussion of the Yin and Zhou Dynasties”
This article is the instructor of the author’s book “The Royal System of Zhou Rong and the Family”.
In the era of war in the country, it was often regarded by the ancients as the “Age of Heart” of Chinese civilization. Although the concept of “axial era” has been criticized a lot in recent years, [1] But if you understand it on an infinite and appropriate level, it can still be regarded as a concept with potential for thinking. Since it is called “silent mind”, the previous political and educational practices and the thoughts generated will be considered “silent mind”, and the subsequent ideological format and political and educational practices will be initiated by “silent mind”. From this, the thinking of the “Axial Mind Age” summarizes the civilization of the “Previous Mind Age” and lays the foundation for the civilization of the “Last Mind Age”.
In China’s thinking structure, it was precisely through reflection and summary of the “pre-society era” that the ancient political and educational practices were planned to be divided into two stages: emperor and king. In other words, the political and educational practices, which were called “emperor” and “king” by later generations, were born in the pre-society era, but the real establishment of the historical view of emperor and king comes from the thinking work of the axiociety era. In a certain meaning, the historical view of the emperor and the king was formed by Confucius and his students in the process of cleaning up the six chapters. The subsequent scholars promoted the situation, which made this historical view of the political and religious was widely accepted.
The historical view of Emperor and Wang Zheng and the Church has emerged a historical featureThe idea of the period is that the civilization history of the “pre-society era” was engraved as the era of emperors and the era of kings. The reason why these two eras were separately introduced is actually the genre of the thinking school of the “society era” developed from the perspective of political and educational models and wrote on them. And using this typification method of political and educational practice to deal with history is a major aspect of the “silent era” thinking.
In other words, the “axis era” thinking develops into a double dimension, not only produces the domain based on theaxis era of understanding of previous history, but also produces the current and future thinking structure. And the current real understanding and future fantasy structure are developed through the understanding of history. Whether it is historical understanding, or the current judgment or the future structure, its inheritance subject is the “supernatural era” thinker.
Jian Jian proposed three ancient historical views in “Teacher of Ancient History with Master Xuan of Xuan”: ancient historical views before the war, ancient historical views during the war, and ancient historical views after the war. [2] In fact, this is the main axis of ancient history. I think this installment has certain justice, but the problem is also very big. The author believes that the main thing is not the warring state as the main axis, but the Confucius group as the main axis, because in terms of the establishment of various ancient historical views, the main thing is not a certain era when we understand the object of the object, but a tree-standing of this ancient historical view. In this regard, the ancient history before Confucius, the ancient history view of Confucius and the ancient history view after Confucius are the key points of the problem.
The so-called ancient historical view of Confucius and his group is the ancient history system focusing on the Six Paths and their inheritance. This system is not a historical study in today’s meaning, but the result of the Six Paths. The establishment of the Sixth Period is a serious matter that is in harmony with the “Still Heart Age”. Through the Sixth Period, the ancient civilization affairs passed down by the King of Zhou and the witch and history systems of various marquises were systematically handled.
This process is a historical book that is divided into modern history and archaeology. The latter seeks the real reality of the historical process; and the historical processing of the Sixth Sect is based on the new ideological foundation of the “Still Mind Age”, and uses new ideas to understand history from the beginning and construct something that transcends history. This is the political and educational essay of the Great Law—the reason why the Sixth Sect is the Sixth Sect is the Sixth Sect. href=”http://twlovediary.com/”>Caring software is here.
The modern new history has truly dealt with civilization, and there is no definite beginning with ideological and laid meaning, that is, there is an opening of a certain kind of history in the new history. This opening can also be avoided by the discovery of archaeological data.The period is moved forward, and this “historical beginning” does not have a solid meaning for the entire civilization after that, but is just a time point or historical segment in the long known history process.
However, the six stories, which mainly focus on the events of the two emperors and the three generations, truly reflect on the historical process, just like “Shangshu” is a real ideological treatment method for ancient political and religious civilization. This method of learning to deal with historical realization will not move forward due to the forward expansion of the known historical process, because it focuses on the kind of thing that lays the foundation for the subsequent Chinese civilization, thus making itself extremely different from modern new historiography dominated by the will to seek truth. No matter what meaning it means, it can be said that the greatest event of the “Age of the Axis” of Chinese civilization is the establishment of the Sixth Period.
If it were said that Confucius and his students had written the Six Books of Inheritance and also established a systematic ancient history system, then once the hundreds of schools of thought have been exposed to the history of ancient civilizations, they would not be able to actually open Confucius again. Therefore, the Hundred Schools of the Warring States Period and the Han Dynasty before the Confucianism were all facing the problem of how to digest Confucius. [3] Not only in this way, the six-system established by Confucius and his group actually completed the classical foundation of Chinese civilization.
The most important result of the thinking of the Axial Age was the establishment of the classical systems of each of the Axial civilizations. The Hebrew tradition completed the classical process of the “Holy Book”, while ancient Greeks produced classical books by Platz, Senofin, and Aristotle on the body of the Ancient Greek civilization – Sucrates. India has collections of “Austria” and Buddha, and China is the establishment of the Six System.
What is related to the classical establishment is that the establishment of the personality and body of each civilization, Jesus of Israel, Confucius of China, Kammani of India, and Sucrates of Greece, became the embodiment of this civilization and its energy. The classic system is the same as the saint system. The saint may become the subject of classical descriptive, or may hide in the classical landscape. However, no matter what, the effect of classical as a major law is mutually exclusive with the personality list of saints, and cooperates to support a civilized political and educational energy and its understanding of humanity, life methods, etc.
In this way, when dealing with China’s axial era, it is impossible to expand without surrounding Confucius and the Six Sects. The establishment of Chinese thinking means in a large sense how to understand Confucius, how to understand the Six Sects, and how to understand Confucius is connected with how
發佈留言